Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Putting together two real big pieces

It's hard not to notice two things going on at the same time right now. To pull from the beginning of a long-ish magazine article I just finished for Sentient Times, "The first is that large numbers of people who may never have felt fully comfortable with where they’ve parked their retirement savings and investment accounts are desperately wondering how to keep what’s left of them from vaporizing in the global meltdown. Over time some of these folks have been watching the “relocalization” movement — the cluster of efforts to strengthen and grow sustainable locally-owned enterprises so that resources circulate in the community instead of leaking to far-off corporate headquarters — with more and more interest. That’s condition number one. The second is that a growing number of creative local people want to start enterprises that would support their families (and other families as well, in some cases) and serve their community in healthy ways. What often holds them back is the absence of capital to start or expand their businesses."
So how to put these two pieces together? The answer, I think, is a vital key to building healthy community out of the ashes raining down on us. If the longer piece linked above is more than you want to read, I digested in in this week's Tidings column.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Now we know how they felt...


If you think back on it, as I did in this week's column, the big timber collapse of the late 80s and early 90s was a pretty accurate sneak preview of what it means to live beyond our means.
We're all loggers now.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Cluelessness on parade

You remember this guy?  "What we've got here...is a failure to communicate."
   A few Oregon public employees have been reminding us of that by complaining that losing a few work days to "unpaid furlough" is an unbearable burden.   
   But in the scheme of really grim contemporary events, is that cluelessness a big deal?   I think it's more of an annoying distraction.  This week's piece asks whether downstream blaming or making decent decisions upstream is more likely to get us what we want.  
   

Sunday, March 1, 2009

It's not like a drive-up window...

A month ago I laid out in general terms the Big Stick Theory, i.e, those who wield the biggest stick in the halls of power get their way in our form of government.  If instead of whining, we'd like to that to be us, we have to 1) assemble the biggest stick we can,  2) learn to use it carefully and selectively, and 3) commit to carrying it permanently.  I wrote earlier columns about 1 &2; this one's about commitment.  It's where we Boomers, IMJ, have most obviously dropped the ball.  
       Does this square with your experience?